Sunday, September 03, 2023

MAADA! WHAT'S THE FUTURE NOW??? 32!o

MCC COMPACT BUNKERED BY JUNE 2023 ELECTIONS FEAVER: IMPACTED BY FAILURE TO UPHOLD DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.


REPORT BY AMADU LAMRAND BAH- AYV NEWS By 1st Septembe 2023.

The United States of America Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) has officially confirmed that the progress of its compact development program with Sierra Leone is experiencing delays.

These delays stem from the MCC’s apprehensions regarding the credibility of Sierra Leone’s electoral process held on June 24, 2023.

Responding to an inquiry about the status of the program, the MCC conveyed via email,

“MCC is concerned about the credibility of the electoral process in Sierra Leone, and these concerns have slowed compact development.”

Sierra Leone’s journey with the MCC began with the successful implementation of the US$44.4 million threshold program, leading the MCC Board of Directors to designate the nation eligible for a compact program in 2021. This compact program, amounting to a US$450 million grant spread over five years, was intended to provide substantial support to the country.

In January 2023, Alice Albright, the Chief Executive Officer of MCC, conveyed her message to President Bio through a letter. The contents of this letter informed the President that the Board’s endorsement of any proposed compact would be subject to tangible evidence showcasing the nation’s ongoing commitment to the fundamental principles of democratic governance.

These principles, which constitute the cornerstone of MCC’s eligibility criteria and scorecard, encompass vital aspects such as the fight against corruption and the assurance of free and equitable elections.

Throughout his campaign leading up to the multi-tier elections on June 24th, President Bio consistently emphasized the significance of the MCC Compact. He highlighted his government’s active pursuit of securing the grant, showcasing the administration’s dedication to instituting reforms that tackle corruption, bolster gender empowerment, and foster open expression.

These efforts resonated with international partners, including the United States government, reflecting their confidence and appreciation for Sierra Leone’s strides toward positive change.

During a State House meeting in February 2023 with Alice Albright, the CEO of MCC, President Bio expressed his gratitude for the strides made toward obtaining MCC approval. He also emphasized the importance of harmonizing priorities for the compact.

Acknowledging the pressing need for energy and the financial challenges confronting the government, President Bio conveyed his appreciation for prioritizing his administration’s proposal. He took the opportunity to underscore the significance of aligning strategic priorities for the compact.

“Given the depth of the need for energy and the budgetary constraints we currently face; I appreciate it if we can prioritize my government’s proposal. So, I want to take this opportunity to ensure that you and I, at the strategic level, have some alignment on the priorities for the compact,” President Bio said.

Nonetheless, recent events following the declaration of his re-election after the June 24 multi-tier elections have cast a shadow over the nation’s aspirations to secure the crucial MCC grant. This grant holds the promise of bolstering the energy and water sectors, which citizens had eagerly anticipated, spurred by assurances from the President during his campaign.

Regrettably, the MCC has communicated that their preliminary intentions to engage in discussions over the proposed compact in Washington, DC, during August, and subsequently present it for Board endorsement in September, have encountered delays.

“In the meantime, MCC is continuing to engage the Government of Sierra Leone in the spirit of partnership that it has built over successive administrations in both the United States and Sierra Leone, to discuss the election-related concerns that have been raised,” the MCC said.

In a correspondence dated July 21, 2023, addressed to Vice President Dr. Mohamed Juldeh Jalloh, Alicia Philip Mandaville, Vice President of the Department of Policy and Evaluation at the MCC, emphasized that the MCC’s Board of Directors and stakeholders within the United States Congress anticipate partner countries to exhibit unwavering dedication to safeguarding democratic rights and conducting multi-party elections that are free, equitable, transparent, and credible.
Mandaville underscored that recent concerns surrounding the integrity of the elections have prompted doubts regarding Sierra Leone’s commitment to these critical criteria. Specifically, the transparency of the tabulation process, anomalies in the election results as declared by the Election Commission of Sierra Leone, and apprehensions about safeguarding fundamental freedoms and civil liberties, including those of election observers, have all come under scrutiny.

“As discussed in our call, concerns about the integrity of the recent elections have called into question Sierra Leone’s commitment to these criteria. Namely, the transparency of the tabulation process, irregularities in the election results announced by the Election Commission of Sierra Leone, and concerns about the protection of fundamental freedoms and civil liberties including those of election observers,” she stated.

While acknowledging the government’s initiatives aimed at addressing these concerns through investigations into the electoral proceedings and fostering public discourse regarding electoral reform and constitutional adherence, Mandaville informed the Vice President that the MCC is compelled to extend the original timeline for initiating compact negotiations in August 2023 and presenting the proposed compact for Board approval in September. This decision stems from the need to attain clarity on the raised concerns.

President Bio in an engagement with civil society leaders after the elections in June while challenging the position of some Election Observer Mission called on citizens to guard against what he referred to as their validation of the country’s elections.

“No international body has any rights. [to interfere with our national politics] We have never done that to the European Union, we have not done that to the United States when they had problems to the point of attacking the Capitol, that’s their democracy, their democracy is with guns. This is our own country, let’s take care of ourselves but it is also not fair and it is unfortunate that some of you out there as civil society keep quiet on certain misrepresentations. We have to take stands for them to respect us, I know them” Bio said.

Regarding matters concerning the elections and tabulation process, the President emphasized that the constitution prescribes the methodology for tabulation. He clarified that neither he nor the Chairman of the Electoral Commission possesses the authority to alter this process. He concluded by stating, “My adherence to the constitution is paramount. I cannot compromise its principles merely because an election observer holds differing opinions.”

Concurrently, Chernor Bah, the Minister of Information and Civic Education, underscored the government’s appreciation for the country’s partnership with the United States and other international allies. As a testament to President Bio’s commitment, he disclosed the initiation of an electoral systems review committee aimed at addressing the raised concerns.

“Sierra Leone and the U.S. enjoy a strong, deep relationship based on values as partners,” he noted.

The MCC also confirmed that they have had ongoing discussions and correspondence with Vice President Jalloh and continue to engage the Government of Sierra Leone to discuss the election-related concerns that have been raised.


In another development, Sarah Van Horne, the Public Affairs Officer at the U.S. Embassy in Freetown    
clarified that the remarks on the outcome of the elections by David Reimer, the outgoing Ambassador represents the position of the U.S. government and not the reflections of any one individual.
Ambassador David Dele Reimer @ Radio 98.1

“As stated by the Ambassador in his most recent interview and our previous statement after the election, the United States continues to be concerned about irregularities in the election results announced by the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL).

As a result, we are examining all our government-to-government programs. These conversations are ongoing, and we have nothing new to announce currently,” she said.

Meanwhile, Anthony J. Blinken, Secretary of State of the United States of America has announced a new visa restriction policy for those who he said undermined the democratic process in the June 2023 Sierra Leone election.
He said that under the policy, the United States will pursue visa restrictions for those believed to be responsible for or complicit in undermining democracy in Sierra Leone including through the manipulation or rigging of the electoral process and the intimidation of voters and elections observers.

There has been no official response from the government of Sierra Leone on the visa ban at the time going to press.

Letter from Alicia Philip Mandaville to VP Juldeh Jalloh dated 21st July 2023.


Posted by Blogger: All photos inserted by poster for illustration  only.
Israel Ojekeh Parper Snr. 3rd September 2023.



Thursday, August 31, 2023

MAADA: WHAT’S THE FUTURE NOW??? 31

Thursday, August 31st, 2023. DESIGNATED PERSONS IN SIERRA LEONE HIT BY IMMIGRATION VISA BAN.
U.S. Imposes Visa Restrictions on Designated Individuals in Sierra Leone In an official statement released on August 31, 2023, Antony J. Blinken, the Secretary of State, has unveiled a significant move by the United States aimed at safeguarding democratic values both within Sierra Leone and globally. The new policy, implemented under Section 212(a)(3)C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, is a resolute response to instances of democratic process manipulation during Sierra Leone's June 2023 election. Under this newly introduced policy, the United States is set to impose visa restrictions on individuals who are suspected of being involved in, or having a hand in, undermining the democratic process in Sierra Leone. The actions that may warrant these restrictions include tampering with the electoral mechanisms, employing threats or physical violence to intimidate voters, election observers, or civil society organizations, as well as violating human rights within the country. The scope of this policy extends even to family members of those deemed responsible for democratic interference. Individuals found to have played a role in subverting the democratic process during the lead-up to, the course of, or the aftermath of Sierra Leone's 2023 elections may find themselves ineligible for U.S. visas under the newly introduced measures. It is imperative to note that the visa restriction policy's focus is specifically on certain individuals and is not a reflection of the U.S. stance towards the Sierra Leonean populace. Instead, it underscores the United States' unwavering dedication to supporting the aspirations of the people of Sierra Leone in conducting elections that are transparent, fair, and representative of their collective will. This move stands as a testament to the United States' commitment to reinforcing democratic principles and the rule of law worldwide. U.S. Imposes Visa Restrictions on Designated Individuals in Sierra Leone In an official statement released on August 31, 2023, Antony J. Blinken, the Secretary of State, has unveiled a significant move by the United States aimed at safeguarding democratic values both within Sierra Leone and globally. The new policy, implemented under Section 212(a)(3)C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, is a resolute response to instances of democratic process manipulation during Sierra Leone's June 2023 election. Under this newly introduced policy, the United States is set to impose visa restrictions on individuals who are suspected of being involved in, or having a hand in, undermining the democratic process in Sierra Leone. The actions that may warrant these restrictions include tampering with the electoral mechanisms, employing threats or physical violence to intimidate voters, election observers, or civil society organizations, as well as violating human rights within the country. The scope of this policy extends even to family members of those deemed responsible for democratic interference. Individuals found to have played a role in subverting the democratic process during the lead-up to, the course of, or the aftermath of Sierra Leone's 2023 elections may find themselves ineligible for U.S. visas under the newly introduced measures. It is imperative to note that the visa restriction policy's focus is specifically on certain individuals and is not a reflection of the U.S. stance towards the Sierra Leonean populace. Instead, it underscores the United States' unwavering dedication to supporting the aspirations of the people of Sierra Leone in conducting elections that are transparent, fair, and representative of their collective will. This move stands as a testament to the United States' commitment to reinforcing democratic principles and the rule of law worldwide. 

 -------------------------------------- 

United States Implements Visa Restrictions on Sierra Leoneans Engaged in Undermining Democracy

Introduction:
The United States government has taken a firm stance against individuals involved in undermining democracy in Sierra Leone. In an effort to promote democratic values and protect the integrity of democratic processes, the U.S. authorities have implemented visa restrictions on Sierra Leoneans found to be engaged in activities that pose a threat to the democratic fabric of their nation. This article explores the reasons behind these visa restrictions and their significance in safeguarding democracy and promoting accountability.

Background:
Sierra Leone has made significant strides in its democratic journey since the end of a decade-long civil war in 2002. However, challenges persist, including attempts to undermine democratic processes and weaken the country's political institutions. Recognizing the importance of preserving democratic principles, the United States has taken proactive measures to address these threats.

Reasons for Visa Restrictions:
The visa restrictions imposed by the United States on Sierra Leoneans involved in undermining democracy aim to achieve several objectives:

1. Promoting Accountability: By restricting visas, the U.S. government sends a strong message that those who engage in activities that undermine democratic processes will face consequences. This measure highlights the importance of accountability for individuals seeking to subvert democracy and disrupt the will of the Sierra Leonean people.

2. Protecting Democratic Institutions: Visa restrictions serve as a deterrent to those who might otherwise exploit their positions of power to manipulate electoral processes, suppress opposition, or engage in corrupt practices. By safeguarding democratic institutions, the United States aims to foster an environment conducive to fair and free elections, as well as the development of transparent governance.

3. Supporting the Will of the People: Visa restrictions act as a means to support the aspirations of Sierra Leonean citizens who seek a government that is representative, accountable, and responsive to their needs. By imposing consequences on those who undermine democratic values, the United States stands in solidarity with the Sierra Leonean people in their pursuit of a vibrant democracy.

Impact and Implications:
The implementation of visa restrictions on Sierra Leoneans involved in undermining democracy carries significant implications, both domestically and internationally. 

Domestically, these measures will serve as a deterrent, discouraging individuals from engaging in undemocratic practices. This will contribute to a more transparent and fair political environment in Sierra Leone, fostering public trust and confidence in democratic processes.

Internationally, the U.S. visa restrictions send a clear message that the United States stands firmly against any attempts to undermine democracy. This stance aligns with the broader global commitment to upholding democratic values and serves as a reminder that democratic norms and principles are universal and non-negotiable.

Conclusion:
The United States government's implementation of visa restrictions on Sierra Leoneans engaged in undermining democracy demonstrates its unwavering commitment to promoting democratic values and protecting the integrity of democratic processes. By holding individuals accountable for their actions, these restrictions serve as a powerful tool to deter undemocratic practices, protect democratic institutions, and support the aspirations of the Sierra Leonean people for a transparent and accountable government. As Sierra Leone continues on its democratic journey, the visa restrictions represent an important step towards building a stronger and more resilient democracy.

By Kabombeh Pen 🖊.

‐----------------------------------------------------------------------
Click Link


Further Reports

1)
 Visa Restriction Policy on Undermining the Democratic Process in Sierra Leone The United States is committed to supporting and advancing democracy in Sierra Leone and around the world. Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy under Section 212(a)(3)C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act for undermining the democratic process in the June 2023 Sierra Leone election. Under this policy, the United States will pursue visa restrictions for those believed to be responsible for, or complicit in, undermining democracy in Sierra Leone, including through the manipulation or rigging of the electoral process; intimidation of voters, election observers, or civil society organizations through threats or acts of physical violence; or the abuse or violation of related human rights in Sierra Leone. Family members of such persons may also be subject to these restrictions. Persons who undermine the democratic process in Sierra Leone—including in the lead-up to, during, and following Sierra Leone’s 2023 elections—may be found ineligible for U.S. visas under this policy. The visa restriction policy announced today will apply to specific individuals and is not directed at the Sierra Leonean people. This decision reflects the commitment of the United States to support Sierra Leoneans’ aspirations to have free and fair elections that demonstrate the will of the people and strengthen democracy and the rule of law.
‐-----------------‐---------------------------------------------------
2)

United States Implements Visa Restrictions on Sierra Leoneans Engaged in Undermining Democracy

Introduction:
The United States government has taken a firm stance against individuals involved in undermining democracy in Sierra Leone. In an effort to promote democratic values and protect the integrity of democratic processes, the U.S. authorities have implemented visa restrictions on Sierra Leoneans found to be engaged in activities that pose a threat to the democratic fabric of their nation. This article explores the reasons behind these visa restrictions and their significance in safeguarding democracy and promoting accountability.

Background:
Sierra Leone has made significant strides in its democratic journey since the end of a decade-long civil war in 2002. However, challenges persist, including attempts to undermine democratic processes and weaken the country's political institutions. Recognizing the importance of preserving democratic principles, the United States has taken proactive measures to address these threats.

Reasons for Visa Restrictions:
The visa restrictions imposed by the United States on Sierra Leoneans involved in undermining democracy aim to achieve several objectives:

1. Promoting Accountability: By restricting visas, the U.S. government sends a strong message that those who engage in activities that undermine democratic processes will face consequences. This measure highlights the importance of accountability for individuals seeking to subvert democracy and disrupt the will of the Sierra Leonean people.

2. Protecting Democratic Institutions: Visa restrictions serve as a deterrent to those who might otherwise exploit their positions of power to manipulate electoral processes, suppress opposition, or engage in corrupt practices. By safeguarding democratic institutions, the United States aims to foster an environment conducive to fair and free elections, as well as the development of transparent governance.

3. Supporting the Will of the People: Visa restrictions act as a means to support the aspirations of Sierra Leonean citizens who seek a government that is representative, accountable, and responsive to their needs. By imposing consequences on those who undermine democratic values, the United States stands in solidarity with the Sierra Leonean people in their pursuit of a vibrant democracy.

Impact and Implications:
The implementation of visa restrictions on Sierra Leoneans involved in undermining democracy carries significant implications, both domestically and internationally. 

Domestically, these measures will serve as a deterrent, discouraging individuals from engaging in undemocratic practices. This will contribute to a more transparent and fair political environment in Sierra Leone, fostering public trust and confidence in democratic processes.

Internationally, the U.S. visa restrictions send a clear message that the United States stands firmly against any attempts to undermine democracy. This stance aligns with the broader global commitment to upholding democratic values and serves as a reminder that democratic norms and principles are universal and non-negotiable.

Conclusion:
The United States government's implementation of visa restrictions on Sierra Leoneans engaged in undermining democracy demonstrates its unwavering commitment to promoting democratic values and protecting the integrity of democratic processes. By holding individuals accountable for their actions, these restrictions serve as a powerful tool to deter undemocratic practices, protect democratic institutions, and support the aspirations of the Sierra Leonean people for a transparent and accountable government. As Sierra Leone continues on its democratic journey, the visa restrictions represent an important step towards building a stronger and more resilient democracy.

By Kabombeh Pen 🖊.

‐-----------------------------------------------------------------


FOREIGN POLICY MATTERS

PROPOSED RESUMPTION OF DIPLOMATIC ENGAGEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ISRAEL: SIERRA LEONE TO ESTABLISH EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM?





Strengthening Diplomatic Ties with Israel: A Call for Upgraded Relations

- Francis Gabbidon Esq

www.thecalabashnewspaper.com 

By Amin Kef (Ranger)

In a recent statement, legal expert Francis Gabbidon Esq., who also serves as a Law Lecturer at Fourah Bay College, emphasized the historical significance of Sierra Leone's diplomatic relationship with Israel. Dating back to Sierra Leone's attainment of independence in 1961, Israel emerged as one of the earliest nations to establish diplomatic connections with the West African nation.

During this period, Israel solidified its presence through an Embassy situated in Freetown, along with diplomatic residences strategically located at Signal Hill and Hill Station. Beyond diplomatic ties, Israel made noteworthy contributions to Sierra Leone's post-independence infrastructure development, facilitated by prominent construction companies such as National Construction Company Ltd., Solel Bonem, and Dizen Goff.

The Israeli construction firms were instrumental in the creation of essential structures in Sierra Leone, including the iconic Parliament Building, which was completed in time for the nation's Independence celebrations. Other notable accomplishments encompassed the Bank of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone Post Office, Oil Refinery, Kingtom Power Station, Cape Sierra Hotel, vital parliamentary and Regent-to-Hill-Station roadways, and the Benguema Military Training Barracks and Training School.

A significant aspect of Israel's engagement was the provision of scholarships to Sierra Leonean students, enabling them to pursue diverse fields of study at renowned institutions in Tel Aviv. Programs ranged from medicine and teacher training to trade unionism, military intelligence, and security.

Advocating for a reciprocal enhancement of diplomatic relations, Gabbidon proposed that Sierra Leone should establish its own Embassy in Israel, encouraging the Israeli Government to re-establish its previous Embassy in Sierra Leone. This renewed cooperation, he asserted, could yield mutual benefits in sectors such as agriculture, horticulture, medicine, technology, and information technology. Of particular importance was the prospect of collaborating with Israel's world-renowned intelligence organization to bolster Sierra Leone's own Intelligence and Security Agency.

The historical connection between the two nations has also seen notable Israeli figures visiting Sierra Leone in the past, including Abba Eban, the Foreign Minister; Golda Meir, the Prime Minister; and David Kimche, Director of Foreign Affairs.

In a contemporary context, other countries that have recently established diplomatic relations with Israel include the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Morocco, Oman, Brunei, and Sudan. As Sierra Leone contemplates the road ahead, the call to rejuvenate its diplomatic rapport with Israel opens up avenues for shared growth and development across various sectors.

(C) The Calabash Newspaper


Sunday, August 27, 2023

MAADA! WHAT'S THE FUTURE NOW??? 30

*MAADA BIO’S WAR AGAINST AFRICANIST PRESS HAS COST SIERRA LEONE FORTUNES*

By Chernoh Alpha M. Bah 



Last year, an investigation by Africanist Press uncovered that Sierra Leonean officials paid at least US$5 million to cyber intelligence groups, including the Israeli-based Cognyte Technologies Limited for cyber intelligence services and tools that were mostly used to target political opponents of the Maada Bio administration.

Africanist Press discovered that the funds were directly transferred by the Bank of Sierra Leone (BSL) between July 2021 and October 2022 to the Israel-based Cognyte Technologies Limited and North Star Enterprise as payments for cyber intelligence solutions and for the supply of public order equipment to security agencies in Sierra Leone.

Our investigation found that a total of US$2,211,025.72 was paid to North Star Enterprise to supply special public order equipment to the Sierra Leone Police; few weeks ahead of the August 10th massacre.

Africanist Press also discovered five specific transactions amounting to US$831,999.80 that were paid directly to Cognyte on 7th July 2021 in various amounts ranging from US$84,316.00 to US$155,000.00 and US$218,841.82 to US$310,000.00. The payments were ordered by the Office of the President and authorized by Ministry of Finance officials after the enactment of the new cyber security legislation.  

In addition to the July 2021 payments, two further payments in separate amounts of US$310,000 and another amount of US$630,000 were also processed and transferred to Cognyte Technologies on 1st October 2021 and 10th May 2022 respectively. 

In total, Africanist Press found that the Central Bank of Sierra Leone transferred over US$2 million to Cognyte Technologies during the first 12 months following the new law on cyber security.

In addition to the Cognyte transactions, Africanist Press also found that a total of US$2,211,025.72 was simultaneously paid to another company listed as North Star Enterprise to supply special public order equipment to the Sierra Leone Police. 

Our investigation discovered that these payments were also processed between 11th January 2022 and 18th July 2022 in multiple amounts ranging from US$184,252.14 to US$210,573.88. The payments were processed in 11 different transactions by banking officials in Sierra Leone, and transferred directly to the United States in the name of North Star Enterprise through the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) in New York.

Evidence shows that Sierra Leonean security agencies, including the Office of National Security (ONS) and Sierra Leone Police, employed the procured cyber services and public order equipment in cyber surveillance activities and other intelligence operations targeting journalists of the Africanist Press as part of a transnational operation designed to silence and criminalize our work. 

The sponsored war against Africanist Press has been ongoing since then and waged by foreign operatives and their local allies from London to Washington, and  from Florida to Israel, and Lebanon to Kenya, Tanzania, and Freetown.

Transactions of Sierra Leonean embassies in Washington, Ankara, London, and the country’s consulate office in Florida, show details of these operations. Part of their unsuccessful efforts have been to criminalize Africanist Press and our genuine work, and to seek to convince foreign governments that Africanist Press is a front for dissident elements. 

Records show that agents of these hired intelligence groups and PR firms met with Sierra Leone police leaders and the internal affairs ministry since at least March 2022, at the height of the reported police violence against citizens in Serra Leone and they were provincial advice and training for the Sierra Leone police ahead of the state-instigated protests and massacre of August 2022. 

This week, local agents of these hired operatives in Freetown have been talking about Maada Bio’s supposed new efforts to hire Jerry Torres and the Mercury firm as PR agents, but what they are actually trying to hide is that Jerry Torres and other operatives from the United Kingdom and other parts of Europe have been to Freetown since March 2022 and they have been actively working with Sierra Leone’s Police authorities ever since on diverse surveillance operations against democratic critics of the Bio regime. 

Sierra Leone’s politicians and their allied agents in civil society and the media are fully aware of the operations of these hired agencies. Many of them are also directly paid from government funds to serve as social media agents for the Bio regime to assist these hired PR firms in its larger disinformation campaigns in the country. 

In April 2021, for instance, local PR efforts to help launder the corrupt image of the Bio regime and to counter publications of the Africanist Press also included series of presidential media appearances on local TV and radio stations and a town hall event held in Freetown where Maada Bio was provided a platform to respond to details of the revealing publications of the Africanist Press. At that event, Maada Bio mentioned his plans for the 2022 electoral reforms including his desire to use the problematic proportional representation system and his intention to dismantle the audit service. The event was organized by local journalists and civil society activists aligned to both ruling and opposition parties in the country. 

Thus, the money paid to cyber surveillance groups and domestic and foreign PR companies to counter Africanist Press in 2021 and 2022 alone would have built 12 standard hospitals and refurbished the FBC campus with relative ease.

Whether they want to admit it or not, it is obvious that the war against Africanist Press has cost Sierra Leone fortunes. Sadly, it is a war that involves Sierra Leone politicians from ruling and opposition parties, and backed by journalists who are acting in concert with foreign surveillance groups and PR companies. Unfortunately, they have been very unsuccessful in their transnational efforts to silence Africanist Press and criminalize our genuine work.

This is why we now insist that what we need in Sierra Leone today is not just an investigation into the elections, but a real examination of these various groups and how they created and contributed to the troubling political and economic disaster that Sierra Leone faces today.

Sierra Leone can not be dangerous for ordinary citizens but safe for the politicians and their international financial actors. We must expose that mask of hostility that has been purposefully designed to crowd out genuine voices against kleptocracy and exploitation.

As Sierra Leonean citizens, we must not surrender our rights to speak up against kleptocracy and authoritarianism no matter how hard they try to stop us. The truth has a life of its own that can’t be extinguished. 

Happy Friday to you all…!!

Chernoh Alpha M. Bah
Africanist Press
USA

——- africanistpress.com ———

MAADA! WHAT'S THE FUTURE NOW??? 29



 WHERE HAS ALL THE MONEY GONE?


Sierra Leone: President illegally suspends audit officials amidst controversy over presidential travel expenses and other financial irregularities  

By Chernoh Alpha M. Bah, Matthew Anderson, and Mark Feldman

Sierra Leonean President Julius Maada Bio has indefinitely suspended two of the most senior members of the country’s national auditing agency. Auditor general, Madam Lara Taylor-Pearce and her deputy, Tamba Momoh, were indefinitely suspended from office on Thursday morning. No official reasons were given by the President's Office for the decision, which many in Sierra Leone, have described as unprecedented.

 

Mrs. Lara Taylor-Pierce, the country’s Auditor General had served as head of Sierra Leone’s Audit Service since 2012. She built an enviable reputation of producing reliable annual audit reports that usually detailed misappropriation and misuse of public funds, corruption, and other financial irregularities across government ministries, departments, and agencies. On Thursday morning, a Presidential Order announced the sudden indefinite suspension of both Taylor-Pearce and her deputy, Tamba Momoh. The Presidential Order also announced that the president had equally requested the establishment of a tribunal to "investigate the professional activities of the auditing agency."

 

Civil society organizations and pro-democracy activists in Sierra Leone have fully condemned the decision, describing the Presidential action as a "constitutional violation and a move to hamper transparency and accountability in public finance management."

 

Africanist Press learned that the President’s decision to suspend the two leading audit officials came after the auditing agency had highlighted financial and procurement irregularities while auditing details of the President's travel expenditures and procurement activities of the Office of the First Lady for FY2020. Audit officials reportedly discovered that the President’s Office had submitted several forged documents, including fake hotel receipts and invoices to the Audit Service as part of the president's travel expenditures for FY2020. In management queries sent to the President's Office in early October 2021, audit officials noted that several documents submitted by the President's Office to justify travel expenses in FY2020, including lists of per diems, and details of alleged procurement-related activities by the President and his delegation while traveling abroad were verified to be false. The submitted receipts and invoices included alleged payments in various amounts ranging from US$50,000 to US$75,000 and US$120,000 paid to hotels in South Africa, Lebanon, Gabon, the United Kingdom, and Ethiopia. Auditors reportedly presented the invoices and receipts to the hotels for audit verification which the hotels denied to have issued. The management of a hotel in South Africa is reportedly considering litigation for the forged receipts, while another hotel claims that incidental expenses incurred by the presidential delegation still remained unpaid.  

 

Apart from the falsified hotel receipts, the audit officials also questioned the amounts and procedures used to withdraw per diem and other funds by the Presidential delegation, including cash withdrawn for alleged medical expenses in Lebanon in August 2020. In the case of the Lebanon trip, auditors found that the President's Office underreported the total of funds withdrawn from the Bank of Sierra Leone (BSL) in the name of the President as per diem and for medical expenses.

 

Expenditure documents submitted by the President's Office claimed that the President withdrew only US$125,000 from the Local and Overseas Travel Account in August 2020 for medical expenses in Lebanon. However, the FY2020 Statement of the President's travel account show that President Bio and his wife, Fatima Bio, withdrew more than Le10 billion (over US$1 million) for the Lebanon trip in August of 2020. Bank records show that between August 26, and September 30, 2020 alone, President Bio withdrew a cumulative Le10,117,531,840.00 (over US$1 million) from the Local and Overseas Travel Account for the supposed emergency trip to Lebanon. The amounts in question comprised an aggregate total of Le7,586,450,552.00 (over US$758,000) allegedly spent on fees paid to a private air charter, alleged payment for the president’s medical bill, and daily subsistence allowances (DSA) for the First Lady Fatima Bio, and other members of the delegation. Auditors questioned the procedures used to withdraw the said funds and they asked why the payments were not made by bank transfer instead of a cash withdrawal. The President's Office provided no documents showing evidence of payment of medical expenses. Officials in the President's Office were also unable to justify the discrepancy between the US$125,000 amount they submitted in withdrawal documents and the amounts in bank statements showing that over US$500,000 cash was taken out in cash by the President for medical expenses ahead of his Lebanon trip.

 

The management queries to the Office of the President also questioned the indiscriminate cash withdrawals, often in foreign currencies, carried out in the name of the President and his wife between 10 January 2020, and 11 December 2020. Auditors noted seven specific large cash withdrawals that were carried out in the name of Madam Bio, all totaling Le1,847,601,064 (over US$180,000). These specific transactions included two withdrawals on 10 January 2020, of Le322,083,000 (over US$32,000) and Le71,013,453 (over US$7,000) for the First Lady while accompanying the President on a trip to the UK, and a further amount of Le276,949,376 (over US$27,000) also withdrawn on January 30, 2020, for a trip to Ethiopia with the President. These cash withdrawals were separate from similar amounts simultaneously withdrawn in the name of the President on the same dates from the Local and Overseas Travel account at BSL for these trips. On 10 January 2020, for example, three cash withdrawal transactions in the amounts of Le272,347,976 (over US$27,000), Le644,166,000 (over US$64,000), and Le649,457,300 (about US$65,000) were accessed in the name of the President for expenditures ahead of the UK and Ethiopia trips. Thus, on 10 January 2020 alone, the aggregate cash withdrawn by the president and his wife amounted to Le2,019,912,730 (over US$200,000). Auditors demanded evidence of expenses for the said funds, including retirement details for funds that were not spent. The Office of the President could also not provide supporting documents to justify the said expenditure, instead they argued that details of the President's medical and other expenses and other related documentation could not be fully disclosed because it constitutes national security information.

 

In addition to these financial irregularities, auditors also found that the wife of the president, First Lady Fatima Jabbe Bio did not comply with procurement procedures when dispensing funds allocated to her office in FY2020. Auditors reported that alleged procurement activities of the Office of the First Lady were not preceded by open competitive bids and were mostly done in violation of the procurement laws of the country. Audit officials also reportedly questioned the procedures allegedly used by finance ministry officials to cancel the domestic debt amounting to over Le24 billion owed by a local construction company affiliated with the president and his wife.

 

 

Africanist Press discovered that auditor general Lara Taylor-Pearce and deputy Tamba Momoh had incurred the wrath of the President by insisting on including the audit findings on the president's travel expenditure and details of the irregularities relating to the First Lady's Office in the FY2020 Audit Report.

 

"The President has directed that these details be removed from the draft report before its publication," officials in the President's Office noted in their management response in late October 2021.

 

Sierra Leone’s Audit Service is the country’s supreme auditing agency mandated to carry out specialized audits on the use of public finances by government ministries, agencies, and departments. Section 119 of the 1991 Constitution of Sierra Leone empowers the Auditor General to undertake periodic audits into the public accounts of the government of Sierra Leone and of all other public offices set-up wholly or partly by public funds, including the Office of the President, the courts, and other public institutions.

 

Section 15 of the Audit Service Act of 2014 provides that “the Auditor-General shall act independently in the exercise of his duties under Section 119 of the 1991 Constitution of Sierra Leone and shall not be subject to the direction or control of any person or authority.”

 

Lawyers in Sierra Leone argue that the president’s decision to suspend the Auditor General and his instruction to institute a tribunal violated both the 1991 Sierra Leone Constitution and the 2014 Audit Service Act.

 

“Section 35(1) of the Audit Service Act 2014 provides that no criminal or civil proceedings shall lie against the Auditor-General, for anything done in good faith in the course of the performance of his functions under this Act,” they said.

 

While arguments over the constitutionality of the auditor general’s suspension have continued, transparency concerns have also been raised with many questioning the president’s commitment to fighting graft and endemic public corruption.

President Bio was elected on a promise to enforce fiscal discipline, and reduce waste and graft in public spending, including reductions in foreign travel by public officials.

 

“My government will develop and introduce a standardized overseas travel policy for the public service and covering all categories of workers, including government ministers as part of additional expenditure control measures,” President Bio announced in Parliament on May 10, 2018, during his state opening address.

 

An internal memo dated August 1, 2019, from the Office of the President addressed to all heads of government ministries, agencies, and departments announced a temporary freeze on overseas travel by public officials.

 

“The President has directed that with immediate effect all ministers, ministers of state, deputy ministers and all other public servants should not embark on official overseas trips, except for statutory engagements, until further notice. Participation at statutory meetings must be cleared with His Excellency the President on the submission of concurrence for the use of public funds,” wrote Secretary to the President Julius Sandy on August 1, 2019.

 

However, despite these public pronouncements and promises, President Bio and his wife spent much of the his nearly four years in office making frequent trips to Europe and Asia, drawing public criticism on the purposes and significance of these travels. Critics of the President say the number of overseas trips is now over 100, a record that exceeds any sitting president of Sierra Leone since the end of the country’s civil war in 2002.

 

Towards the end of 2019, however, Jacob Jusu Saffa – Bio’s former finance minister – proposed a new legislative provision to grant President Bio unregulated access to travel money.

 

The Finance Ministry’s Finance Amendment Act of 2020 called for an amendment to Section 65 of the 2016 Public Financial Management Act, which is the law that regulates government travel expenditure. The amendment substituted the law with a new provision that would have allowed Bio unregulated access to travel money.

 

Section 42 of the proposed 2020 Finance Act requested Parliament to approve the new legislative provision for non-accountable use of travel funds by the President and his deputy for all international travels. The proposed law specifically provides in Section 42(5) for “non-accountable imprest to be provided for daily international travel expenses, excluding purchase of tickets incurred by the President and Vice President.”

 

Parliament initially passed the proposed legislation into law in late November 2019, but in early December 2019, Parliamentarians voted again to remove the legislation from the 2020 Finance Act due to public pressure. The law had given the President, and two of his top officials – the Vice President and Speaker of Parliament – open cheques to use public funds when on overseas travel.

 

However, an Africanist Press investigation in early January 2021 discovered that President Bio and his wife collectively withdrew a total of over Le30 billion Leones (more than US$3 million) from the Bank of Sierra Leone (BSL) for alleged travel expenses in fiscal year 2020 alone, despite bans on international travel due to the coronavirus pandemic.

 

We have published on the Africanist Press website the FY2020 Bank Statement showing evidence of all withdrawals for travel expenses, including per diems, alleged payments for tickets, and other cash withdrawals for the reported transactions that were the subject of the audit. For more information, see: https://africanistpress.com/2021/11/15/sierra-leone-president-illegally-suspends-audit-officials-amidst-controversy-over-presidential-travel-expenses-and-other-financial-irregularities/

https://africanistpress.com/category/breaking-news/





xxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx

More comments 


FOCUS ON SIERRA LEONE:13 November 2021


My thinking on the suspension of the auditor general.  


Here is my story.It is not the government's story. They have access to all the media inside and outside of  Sierra Leone to put their own story across. 


I will start by saying : If this auditor general publishes and defend  her audit report in that form, it will be extremely damaging to the  government.


So what do we do? Let us don't announce her summary  sacking for now but we should put her on an indefinite suspension and wait to see her reaction and that of the public.  Ah! but if we suspend her alone ,leaving her deputy to take charge,  he will be effectively acting and having the administrative authority to defend the report. 


So what do we do to preempt this ? We need to thwart the process and disrupt the existing high command of the audit department. When both the auditor general and the deputy are dislocate through indefinite suspension their  report will then remain in abeyance. 


But we need to find a reason, because no government has acted in this way before against the holder of the office of the auditor general.  


However fictitious the reasons might be, they  may have the effect  to distract public attention on the damning report against our government .


The highly respected auditor general, Mrs Lara Taylor Pearce has been in the job for over ten years during which she had exposed, with no compromise,  the massive corruption and fiscal indiscipline in the APC administration of president Koroma.  Her report specifically highlighted the missing 14 million dollars Ebola funds and other fraudulent financial spendings without the perpetrators either following proper procurement rules  or accounted for the missing funds.


The Bio administration fast moving to the end of its 5 years mandate has questioned the auditor General's credibility by suspending the auditor general and placed her under their investigation just  days before she was due  to release her report,which  implicated the president, his wife ,the finance ministry and other government officials for massive misuse and unaccounted for public funds runing into hundreds of millions of dollars. 


Where is Sierra Leone heading to. I thought the APC was the "most corrupt and incompetent."administration.  Indeed I wrote and published this whilst the party was  in power. 


But based on my reading of situations in Sierra Leone under the so call "new direction "all hopes to build our economy and strive for a cohesive and just society are dashed. 


Disgusting high level corruption is swirling around the corridors of power in Sierra Leone.


 Living  under the paopas is becoming an unbelievable nightmare, for me personally. 


I am not dissapointed, however, for I expected this mess and warned against the paopa militant faction,  led by Bio taken over the SLPP leadership. 


I am genuinely sorry for some of the brilliant minds and technocrates who have left their careers to return home and serve their country under this paopa administration.


Yankuba G Kai-Samba is a former  SLPP UK secretary general under president Kabba's one nation SLPP government.

Chelmsford-UK

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

*WHAT’S IN THAT REPORT?*

*That’s all we want to know now…

*By Dr. Dennis Bright*

*Chairman and Leader, NGC*

Since news of the sacking or “indefinite suspension” of the Auditor General broke out, I have been doing a lot of thinking. I was especially asking myself questions such as: why would President Bio want to sack this woman at a time when the dust of the European Union’s frank and damning report has still not settled, when people are still angry about his lackluster performance at the climate conference and all that? 

But thanks to the Africanist Press, whose reports have never been challenged by the Government, we now know that the 2020 Audit Report, when it is released as prepared by Lara Taylor Pearce may reveal misdeeds, malpractices and fraudulent activities in very high places that are unheard of in the sixty years history of independent Sierra Leone. 


One thing we must make clear is this: anything they tell us now that does not have to do with what is in that report is a mere distraction; we don’t want to know all the things they are telling us now about this woman, that she did a cover up for the Mayor or she did not follow the procurement rules or that maybe she stole a potato at the Freetown Supermarket. You had enough time to tell us all that, but you didn’t. Now, what the nation is interested in is what is in that report that you do not want us to hear and that made you send her away?  We don’t want any distractions. You cannot just come up with a tribunal to investigate the good lady just two weeks before she was going to expose your “egregious” corruption, as the former Chief Minister would call it. What’s done in the darkness must come to light. 


I would like to inform my compatriots in Government that this Lara Taylor Pearce story is not going to blow over. This is not going to be shelved like the case of the 49,000 bags of Chinese donated rice that disappeared within the Government, stolen or “commandeered.” If you think that the Christmas fever is going to make this go cold, please start thinking again. We will hear that Audit Report, unfiltered and unadulterated. And if you think you can just sack that woman when you have no right to, let’s see if the Constitution of this country has now become your tissue paper. I feel so sorry for you all.  


And I do hope that Lara will not take the bait and give up, never mind the threats and intimidation. That will be the professional suicide they are hoping for. Be assured, strong lady, the people are behind you because you are the last hope for decency in this s……..hole (courtesy of the former U.S. President Trump). Good is not dead yet and God is alive.



—————————————————————-

SLPP DANCING THE TWIST IN THE AUDITOR GENERAL MRS LARA TAYLOR-PEARCE IMMEDIATE INDEFINITE SUSPENSION SAGA!

🌴

*SLPP Regime is Mute as BBC Umaru Fofana conflicts with Lara Taylor-Pearce version on "Indefinite Suspension" Letter*

By Awareness Times.

As the SLPP-led Government continues to keep mute on the highly topical issue, the news of Auditor General Mrs. Lara Taylor-Pearce receiving a Letter addressed to her from Office of the President and informing her that she has been sent on an "indefinite" suspension, is now proving to be quite dubious and mischievous.

The now-impugned news was reported on by BBC's Umaru Fofana but in a short statement issued by Taylor-Pearce herself, she says nothing like that. Instead, she gives a conflicting version informing that what she has seen is not a suspension letter addressed to her but rather a letter from H.E. President Bio's Secretary that was addressed to the Chairman of the Audit Service Board. The Board is the supervising entity of the Audit Service.

Clearly from her written words, the Auditor General has not received any Letter sending her on suspension yet.

"She is going to be suspended but she has not yet been suspended so the news saying otherwise is very misleading and a clear case of ill-bred, alarmist journalism," wrote Professor Karim Jalloh, an accounting lecturer staying in the United States.

However, it is a fact that there may indeed be ongoing plans to have Taylor-Pearce sent on suspension. A leaked letter from the Deputy Minister of Justice to the Chief Justice speaks to that.

All indications are that a Tribunal is now being set up to investigate what the Deputy Minister of Justice describes in the leaked letter as "several allegations in form of complaints" that "have been lodged to His Excellency the President against the Auditor General Mrs. Lara Taylor-Pearce and her Deputy Mr. Tamba Momoh amounting to misconduct or lack of professional performance whilst in office".

Meanwhile, the precise words of Lara Taylor-Pearce as issued on social media on Friday 12th November 2021 does not say she has received a suspension letter.

"I can confirm that I was handed a letter signed by the Secretary to the President to the Chairman of the ASSL Advisory Board, stating that the Attorney General has been asked to set up a tribunal to look into the ASSL for professional performance or the lack thereof. Further that myself and Mr Tamba Momoh, my deputy should be sent on suspension with immediate effect," Taylor-Pearce wrote.

Whilst the Audit Service Board is fully empowered to send Deputy Auditor General Tamba Momoh and any other Deputy Auditor General on suspension, it is a fact that the suspension of the Auditor General can only be done by the President himself.

END.

©️ *Awareness Times Newspaper*

Monday November 15th 2021